Trauma-focused therapy in early intervention for psychosis settings: Results of a feasibility RCT of 'EMDR for psychosis'

Aims: Trauma is particularly prevalent amongst Early Intervention (EI) patients and is associated with adverse clinical and prognostic outcomes. To determine the feasibility of a large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an 'EMDR for psychosis' intervention for trauma survivors with active psychotic symptoms supported by EI services, we conducted a single-blind RCT comparing 16 sessions of EMDRp + TAU versus TAU only. Method(s): EMDRp therapy and trial assessments were completed both in-person and remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, and key feasibility outcomes (recruitment & retention, therapy attendance/ engagement, adherence to EMPRp treatment protocol, and the 'promise of efficacy' of EMDRp on relevant clinical outcomes) were examined at 6- and 12-month post-randomization assessments. Results and Conclusion(s): 60 participants (100% of the recruitment target) received TAU or EMDR + TAU. The feasibility criteria examined in this trial were fully met, and EMDRp was associated with promising signals of efficacy on a range of valuable post-treatment outcomes, including improved psychotic symptoms (PANSS), subjective recovery (QPR), post-traumatic symptoms (PCL-5;ITQ), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and general health status (EQ-5D-VAS) at the 6-month assessment. Signals of efficacy at 12-month were less pronounced, but remained robust for trauma symptoms and general health status. The findings will be discussed with relevance to future clinical trials of trauma-focused therapy in clients with early psychosis, and the provision of more tailored trauma therapies for EI service users.

Updated results from MOMENTUM: Momelotinib vs. Danazol in JAK inhibitor-experienced, symptomatic, and anaemic myelofibrosis patients

The phase 3 MOMENTUM study (NCT04173494) of the ACVR1/JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor momelotinib (MMB) vs. danazol (DAN) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) previously treated with a JAK inhibitor (JAKi) met the primary endpoint and all key secondary endpoints at week 24 (W24). We provide updated results from week 48 assessments. Eligible patients had primary or post-ET/ PV MF;DIPSS high, Int-2, or Int-1 risk;Total Symptom Score (TSS) >=10;haemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL;platelets >=25 x 109/L;prior JAKi for >=90 days (>=28 days if red blood cell [RBC] transfusions >=4 units in 8 weeks or grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia/anaemia/ hematoma);and palpable spleen >=5 cm. Randomisation was 2:1 to MMB 200 mg/day or DAN 600 mg/day for 24 weeks, followed by open-label (OL) MMB. Week 48 endpoints included durations of response (TSS, transfusion independence [TI], splenic) and overall and leukaemia-free survival (OS, LFS). As of 17 May 2022, 93/130 (72%) MMB -> MMB and 41/65 (63%) DAN -> MMB patients received OL MMB;mean MMB durations were 48 weeks and 24 weeks, respectively. Analyses for W24 responders showed the following: of TSS responders, 31/32 (97%) MMB -> MMB and 6/6 DAN -> MMB patients had TSS < baseline;of TI responders, 36/40 (90%) and 10/13 (77%) had no RBC transfusions or Hb <8 g/dL;and of spleen responders, all patients had splenic volume < baseline. In the OL phase, the most common grade >=3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were thrombocytopenia (MMB -> MMB, 9%;DAN -> MMB, 15%) and anaemia (MMB -> MMB, 9%;DAN -> MMB, 2%). Grade >=3 infections occurred in 19% of MMB -> MMB and 10% of DAN -> MMB patients, including grade >=3 (nonfatal) COVID-19. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurred in 2% of patients in each arm, and none discontinued MMB due to PN. TEAEs led to MMB discontinuation in 18% (MMB -> MMB) vs. 10% (DAN -> MMB). A trend towards improved OS up to W24 was previously observed with MMB vs. DAN (hazard ratio [HR], 0.506;p = 0.0719);after all patients crossed over to OL MMB, OS and LFS curves for both arms converged (HR, 0.945, 95% CI, 0.528-1.693;HR, 0.830, 95% CI, 0.473-1.4555). Sixty of 81 (74%) MMB -> MMB and 29 of 43 (67%) DAN -> MMB patients with baseline platelets <=150 x 109/L entered the OL phase. Efficacy and safety results in thrombocytopenic subgroups in the OL period were consistent with the intent-to- treat (ITT) population. OL MMB maintained symptom, TI, and spleen responses with continued good survival and safety in the ITT and low platelet populations. MMB may address an unmet need in anaemic patients with MF.

QSAR and DFT Studies of Some Tacrine-Hydroxamate Derivatives as Inhibitors of Cholinesterase (AChEs) in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Introduction: This work was devoted to an in silico investigation conducted on twenty-eight Tacrine-hydroxamate derivatives as a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease using DFT and QSAR modeling techniques. Method(s): The data set was randomly partitioned into a training set (22 compounds) and a test set (6 compounds). Then, fourteen models were built and were used to compute the predicted pIC50 of compounds belonging to the test set. Result(s): Al built models were individualy validated using both internal and external validation methods, including the Y-Randomization test and Golbraikh and Tropsha's model acceptance criteria. Then, one model was selected for its higher R2, R2test, and Q2cv values (R2 = 0.768, R2adj = 0.713, MSE = 0.304, R2test=0.973, Q2cv = 0.615). From these outcomes, the activity of the studied compounds toward the main protease of Cholinesterase (AChEs) seems to be influenced by 4 descriptors, i.e., the total dipole moment of the molecule (mu), number of rotatable bonds (RB), molecular topology radius (MTR) and molecular topology polar surface area (MTPSA). The effect of these descriptors on the activity was studied, in particular, the increase in the total dipole moment and the topological radius of the molecule and the reduction of the rotatable bond and topology polar surface area increase the activity. Conclusion(s): Some newly designed compounds with higher AChEs inhibitory activity have been designed based on the best-proposed QSAR model. In addition, ADMET pharmacokinetic properties were carried out for the proposed compounds, the toxicity results indicate that 7 molecules are nontoxic.Copyright © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.

Causal relationships between COVID-19 and osteoporosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study in European population.

Introduction: The causal relationship between Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and osteoporosis (OP) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effect of COVID-19 severity (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, and severe COVID-19) on OP by a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Methods: We conducted a two-sample MR analysis using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the main analysis method. Four complementary methods were used for our MR analysis, which included the MR-Egger regression method, the weighted median method, the simple mode method, and the weighted mode method. We utilized the MR-Egger intercept test and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) global test to identify the presence of horizontal pleiotropy. Cochran's Q statistics were employed to assess the existence of instrument heterogeneity. We conducted a sensitivity analysis using the leave-one-out method. Results: The primary results of IVW showed that COVID-19 severity was not statistically related to OP (SARS-CoV-2 infection: OR (95% CI) = 0.998 (0.995 ~ 1.001), p = 0.201403; COVID-19 hospitalization: OR (95% CI) =1.001 (0.999 ~ 1.003), p = 0.504735; severe COVID-19: OR (95% CI) = 1.000 (0.998 ~ 1.001), p = 0.965383). In addition, the MR-Egger regression, weighted median, simple mode and weighted mode methods showed consistent results. The results were robust under all sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: The results of the MR analysis provide preliminary evidence that a genetic causal link between the severity of COVID-19 and OP may be absent.

No genetic causal association between systemic lupus erythematosus and COVID-19.

Objective: Emerging evidence suggests an increased prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype of autoimmune disease, compared to the general population. However, the conclusions were inconsistent, and the causal relationship between COVID-19 and SLE remains unknown. Methods: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the bidirectional causal relationship between COVID-19 and SLE using bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, including MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and the inverse variance weighting (IVW) method. Results: The results of IVW showed a negative effect of SLE on severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.962, p = 0.040) and COVID-19 infection (OR = 0.988, p = 0.025), which disappeared after Bonferroni correction. No causal effect of SLE on hospitalized COVID-19 was observed (OR = 0.983, p = 0.148). In the reverse analysis, no causal effects of severe COVID-19 infection (OR = 1.045, p = 0.664), hospitalized COVID-19 (OR = 0.872, p = 0.109), and COVID-19 infection (OR = 0.943, p = 0.811) on SLE were found. Conclusion: The findings of our bidirectional causal inference analysis did not support a genetically predicted causal relationship between SLE and COVID-19; thus, their association observed in previous observational studies may have been caused by confounding factors.

Causal associations between chronic hepatitis B and COVID-19 in East Asian populations.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been inconsistent in traditional observational studies. METHODS: We explored the total causal and direct causal associations between CHB and the three COVID-19 outcomes using univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses, respectively. Genome-wide association study datasets for CHB and COVID-19 were obtained from the Japan Biobank and the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, respectively. RESULTS: Univariate MR analysis showed that CHB increased the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, P = 3.39E-03), hospitalized COVID-19 (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.13, P = 7.31E-08), and severe COVID-19 (OR = 1.16, 95%CI 1.08-1.26, P = 1.43E-04). A series of subsequent sensitivity analyses ensured the stability and reliability of these results. In multivariable MR analyses adjusting for type 2 diabetes, body mass index, basophil count, and smoking, genetically related CHB is still positively associated with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11, P = 1.44E-03) and hospitalized COVID-19 (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.16, P = 5.13E-07). However, the causal link between CHB and severe COVID-19 was attenuated after adjustment for the above variables. In addition, the MR analysis did not support the causal effect of COVID-19 on CHB. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that CHB increases COVID-19 susceptibility and severity among individuals of East Asian ancestry.

COVID-19 and sarcopenia-related traits: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Emerging evidence suggested that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients were more prone to acute skeletal muscle loss and suffer sequelae, including weakness, arthromyalgia, depression and anxiety. Meanwhile, it was observed that sarcopenia (SP) was associated with susceptibility, hospitalization and severity of COVID-19. However, it is not known whether there is causal relationship between COVID-19 and SP-related traits. Mendelian randomization (MR) was a valid method for inferring causality. Methods: Data was extracted from the COVID-19 Host Genetic Initiative and the UK Biobank without sample overlapping. The MR analysis was performed with inverse variance weighted, weighted median, MR-Egger, RAPS and CAUSE, MR-APSS. Sensitivity analysis was conducted with MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO to eliminate pleiotropy. Results: There was insufficient result in the MR-APSS method to support a direct causal relationship after the Bonferroni correction. Most other MR results were also nominally consistent with the MR-APSS result. Conclusions: Our study first explored the causal relationship between COVID-19 and SP-related traits, but the result indicated that they may indirectly interact with each other. We highlighted that older people had better absorb enough nutrition and strengthen exercise to directly cope with SP during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The public health impact of poor sleep on severe COVID-19, influenza and upper respiratory infections.

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep is associated with an increased risk of infections and all-cause mortality but the causal direction between poor sleep and respiratory infections has remained unclear. We examined if poor sleep contributes as a causal risk factor to respiratory infections. METHODS: We used data on insomnia, influenza and upper respiratory infections (URIs) from primary care and hospital records in the UK Biobank (N ≈ 231,000) and FinnGen (N ≈ 392,000). We computed logistic regression to assess association between poor sleep and infections, disease free survival hazard ratios, and performed Mendelian randomization analyses to assess causality. FINDINGS: Utilizing 23 years of registry data and follow-up, we discovered that insomnia diagnosis associated with increased risk for infections (FinnGen influenza Cox's proportional hazard (CPH) HR = 4.34 [3.90, 4.83], P = 4.16 × 10-159, UK Biobank influenza CPH HR = 1.54 [1.37, 1.73], P = 2.49 × 10-13). Mendelian randomization indicated that insomnia causally predisposed to influenza (inverse-variance weighted (IVW) OR = 1.65, P = 5.86 × 10-7), URI (IVW OR = 1.94, P = 8.14 × 10-31), COVID-19 infection (IVW OR = 1.08, P = 0.037) and risk of hospitalization from COVID-19 (IVW OR = 1.47, P = 4.96 × 10-5). INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that chronic poor sleep is a causal risk factor for contracting respiratory infections, and in addition contributes to the severity of respiratory infections. These findings highlight the role of sleep in maintaining sufficient immune response against pathogens. FUNDING: Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Academy of Finland, Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, National Institutes of Health.

Causal associations and genetic overlap between COVID-19 and intelligence.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 might cause neuroinflammation in the brain, which could decrease neurocognitive function. We aimed to evaluate the causal associations and genetic overlap between COVID-19 and intelligence. METHODS: We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to assess potential associations between three COVID-19 outcomes and intelligence (N = 269,867). The COVID phenotypes included SARS-CoV-2 infection (N = 2,501,486), hospitalized COVID-19 (N = 1,965,329), and critical COVID-19 (N = 743,167). Genome-wide risk genes were compared between the genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets on hospitalized COVID-19 and intelligence. In addition, functional pathways were constructed to explore molecular connections between COVID-19 and intelligence. RESULTS: The MR analyses indicated that genetic liabilities to SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR: 0.965, 95% CI: 0.939-0.993) and critical COVID-19 (OR: 0.989, 95% CI: 0.979-0.999) confer causal effects on intelligence. There was suggestive evidence supporting the causal effect of hospitalized COVID-19 on intelligence (OR: 0.988, 95% CI: 0.972-1.003). Hospitalized COVID-19 and intelligence share ten risk genes within two genomic loci, including MAPT and WNT3. Enrichment analysis showed that these genes are functionally connected within distinct subnetworks of 30 phenotypes linked to cognitive decline. The functional pathway revealed that COVID-19-driven pathological changes within the brain and multiple peripheral systems may lead to cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that COVID-19 may exert a detrimental effect on intelligence. The tau protein and Wnt signaling may mediate the influence of COVID-19 on intelligence.

Surrogate Marker Assessment Using Mediation and Instrumental Variable Analyses in a Case-Cohort Design

The identification of surrogate markers for gold standard outcomes in clinical trials enables future cost-effective trials that target the identified markers. Due to resource limitations, these surrogate markers may be collected only for cases and for a subset of the trial cohort, giving rise to what is termed the case-cohort design. Motivated by a COVID-19 vaccine trial, we propose methods of assessing the surrogate markers for a time-to-event outcome in a case-cohort design by using mediation and instrumental variable (IV) analyses. In the mediation analysis we decomposed the vaccine effect on COVID-19 risk into an indirect effect (the effect mediated through the surrogate marker such as neutralizing antibodies) and a direct effect (the effect not mediated by the marker), and we propose that the mediation proportions are surrogacy indices. In the IV analysis we aimed to quantify the causal effect of the surrogate marker on disease risk in the presence of surrogatedisease confounding which is unavoidable even in randomized trials. We employed weighted estimating equations derived from nonparametric maximum likelihood estimators (NPMLEs) under semiparametric probit models for the time-to-disease outcome. We plugged in the weighted NPMLEs to construct estimators for the aforementioned causal effects and surrogacy indices, and we determined the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators. Finite sample performance was evaluated in numerical simulations. Applying the proposed mediation and IV analyses to a mock COVID-19 vaccine trial data, we found that 84.2% of the vaccine efficacy was mediated by 50% pseudovirus neutralizing antibody and that neutralizing antibodies had significant protective effects for COVID-19 risk.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intravenous Ozonated Normal Saline in the Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Disease: A randomized control trial

Background: There is still no specific treatment strategy for COVID-19 other than supportive management. The potential biological benefits of ozone therapy include reduced tissue hypoxia, decreased hypercoagulability, modulated immune function by inhibiting inflammatory mediators, improved phagocytic function, and impaired viral replication. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous ozonated normal saline on patients with severe COVID-19 disease. Method(s): In this study, a single centralized randomized clinical trial was conducted on 80 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. The patients were selected by random allocation method and divided into two groups A and B. In group A (control group), patients were given standard drug treatment, and in group B (intervention group), patients received ozonated normal saline in addition to the standard drug treatment. In the intervention group, 400 mL of normal saline was weighed by 40 mug/ kg of body weight and was injected into patients within 15 to 30 minutes (80 to 120 drops per minute). This process was done daily every morning for a week. Primary and secondary outcomes of the disease included changes in the following items: length of hospital stay, inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein (CRP), clinical recovery, arterial blood oxygen status, improvement of blood disorders such as leukopenia and leukocytosis, duration of ventilator attachment, and rapid clearance of lung lesions on CT scans. The need for intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization, the length of ICU stay, and the mortality rate in patients of the two groups was compared. Result(s): According to the results of the initial outcome variable analysis, the probability of discharge of patients who received the normal ozonated saline intervention was 33% higher than patients who did not receive this intervention;however, this relationship was not statistically significant (HR = 0.67, 95%, CI = 0.42-1.06, P value = 0.089). The chance of ICU hospitalization in patients of the intervention group was three times more than that of the comparison group, but this relationship was not significant (odds ratio = 4.4 95% CI = 1.32-14.50, P value = 0.016). The use of ozonated normal saline was found to increase the risk of death by 1.5 times but this relationship was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 1.5, 95% CI = .24-9.75, P value = 0.646). Ozonated normal saline had a significant effect on changes in respiration rate (in the intervention group the number of breaths was decreased) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (in the intervention group the erythrocyte sedimentation rate was increased);however, it had no significant effect on other indicators. Conclusion(s): The present study showed that ozone therapy in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 could help improve some primary and secondary outcomes of the disease. Governments and health policymakers should make ozone therapy an available care service so that the need for advanced treatment facilities decreases;consequently, this measure may improve patient safety, prevent lung tissue destruction, and control cytokine storms in patients. Additionally, health decision-makers need to aim for the effective clinical improvement of patients, especially severe ones, and the reduction of their mortality. However, further large-scale multicenter studies with larger sample sizes considering drug side effects and other variables influencing the clinical course of COVID-19 can provide more information on the effectiveness and importance of ozone therapy.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s);Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

Genetic correlation, causal relationship, and shared loci between vitamin D and COVID-19: A genome-wide cross-trait analysis.

Observational studies have shown that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection, yet little is known about the shared genomic architectures between them. Leveraging large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, we investigated the genetic correlation and causal relationship between genetically determined vitamin D and COVID-19 using linkage disequilibrium score regression and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses, and conducted a cross-trait GWAS meta-analysis to identify the overlapping susceptibility loci of them. We observed a significant genetic correlation between genetically predicted vitamin D and COVID-19 (rg = -0.143, p = 0.011), and the risk of COVID-19 infection would decrease by 6% for every 0.76 nmol L-1 increase of serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations in generalized MR (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99, p = 0.019). We identified rs4971066 (EFNA1) as a risk locus for the joint phenotype of vitamin D and COVID-19. In conclusion, genetically determined vitamin D is associated with COVID-19. Increased levels of serum 25OHD concentration may benefit the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

Corrigendum: Circulating polyunsaturated fatty acids and COVID-19: a prospective cohort study and Mendelian randomization analysis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923746.].

The causal links between gut microbiota and COVID-19: A Mendelian randomization study.

Several studies have shown a possible correlation between gut microbiota and COVID-19. However, the cause-and-effect relationship between the two has not been investigated. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study (MR) study using publicly available GWAS data. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) analysis was the main MR analysis technique and was supplemented with other sensitivity analyses. Forty-two bacterial genera were associated with COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, and severity in the IVW method. Among these gut microbiota, five gut microbiota (genus unknowngenus [id.1000005472], family unknownfamily [id.1000005471], genus Tyzzerella3, order MollicutesRF9.id.11579, and phylum Actinobacteria) were significantly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization and severity. Three gut microbiota (class Negativicutes, order Selenomonadales, and class Actinobacteria) were significantly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization and susceptibility, while two microbiota (class Negativicutes and order Selenomonadales) were significantly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization and severity, and susceptibility. Sensitivity analysis did not detect any heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. Our findings demonstrated that several microorganisms were causally linked to COVID-19, and improved our understanding of the relationship between gut microbiota and COVID-19 pathology.

Fluvoxamine with bromhexine combination to prevent clinical deterioration in SARS-CoV-2

Introduction/Aim: We conducted an open label, randomized, controlled trial to assess whether fluvoxamine combined with bromhexine, given during mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 illness, prevented clinical deterioration due to their proposed immune modulatory effects. Method(s): Participants had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, experiencing mild to moderate symptoms and oxygen saturation of >=92%. Participants were randomly assigned to receive fluvoxamine (100 mg days 1 and 2, followed by 150 mg daily till day 14) with bromhexine (FLU/BRO) (16 mg daily till day 10) or favipiravir alone (FAV) (3600 mg day 1 followed by 1600 mg daily till day 5). Primary outcome was clinical deterioration within 30 days of randomization defined as shortness of breath or hospitalization for shortness of breath or pneumonia and oxygen saturation >=92%, on room air or need for supplemental oxygen to achieve oxygen saturation of >=92%. Result(s): 158 participants were randomized (average age 50 years (range 18-68 years);68 [43%] women), and 142 (89%) completed the trial. 0/78 participants experience clinical deterioration with FLU/BRO and 18/64 patients with FAV. TNF-alpha, IL-6 IL-8 and IL-1beta levels were significantly (p < 0.005) reduced with FLU/BRO compared to FAV at day 3, 5, 7 and 14. 0/78 participants had long COVID symptoms with FLU/BRO compared to 32/64 (50%) with FAV (p < 0.005). One serious (clumsiness or unsteadiness) and 10 other adverse events were reported with FLU/BRO compared to 5 serious and 12 other adverse events with FAV. Conclusion(s): Results suggest there was significantly less clinical deterioration in symptomatic COVID-19 participants treated with FLU/BRO.

Exploring patient response towards hotline-based telemedicine service in Bangladesh

Background: Telemedicine system enables doctors and patients to communicate while staying afar which can be helpful for areas with lesser health facilities and at times of natural or health disasters. In developing countries like Bangladesh, telemedicine service offers the potential for wider health access and equity if effectively implemented. Therefore, the response and acceptance of care receivers who are the main beneficiaries of the service should be explored. As Dhaka University Telemedicine Programme (DUTP) is a non-profit University project-induced successful telemedicine service in Bangladesh, our study was conducted on the DUTP hotline-based telemedicine programme aimed to explore patients' prior knowledge and response (experience, satisfaction and acceptance) about the service. Method(s): The cross-sectional study was conducted by interviewing 200 participants over the phone with a structured questionnaire to analyze their knowledge and response. Participants were selected by randomization from the patient pool of hotline-based DUTP telemedicine service. The data was analyzed using SPSSv20. Results and discussion: Among the participants, 41% of total participants knew about telemedicine services before COVID-19. Average patient satisfaction was well above moderate level (p-value< 0.01;mean 3.88). 16.5% respondents mentioned about having any problem while availing the service where 'treatment or service related problem' was the most common. Significant association was found between people's 'occupation' and 'knowledge before COVID-19' (p = 0.002) indicating to the probable role of profession or occupation in molding people's health-service related knowledge. Patient-doctor communication ['perception about doctor's adequate evaluation (Q3)' and 'understanding doctor's advice properly (Q4)'] was found to be significantly associated with 'age' and 'location (division)' while most respondents (around 90%) perceived the communication as effective. 'Age' had also an association with 'treatment or service related problem'. 80.5% were willing to take the service in the future even by paying fees. All participants appreciated telemedicine service in general when they were asked about its possible inclusion in mainstream primary healthcare. Conclusion(s): The overall response of patients toward DUTP hotline-based telemedicine, in general, came out to be positive. Concerned authorities and policymakers may exploit this accepting attitude of people toward developing effective telemedicine services in order to ensure wider health and well-being of population.Copyright © 2023 The Authors

Impact of standard versus enhanced personal protective equipment onto team performance during simulated emergency in ICU: randomised controlled trial (PPE-TEAM trial)

Introduction: During the recent COVID-19 pandemics, hospital staff often used personal protective equipment (PPE) beyond the standards recommended by the public health authorities. The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of the additional PPE compared to the standard PPE onto team performance when dealing with a medical emergency. Method(s): Single centre, prospective, randomized, controlled, openlabel, study compared 22 teams, consisting of a doctor and 2 nurses, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to use standard PPE or Super-Safe Setup in a simulated medical crisis. Before randomisation, all teams underwent a standardised mock scenario without the use of PPE was used to assess the performance at baseline. The primary outcome was Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM), secondary outcomes included the timing and quality parameters of CPR and physiological changes the rescuers. Result(s): As compared to standard PPE recommended by WHO [1], the use of additional PPE that included hooded coverall, significantly reduced non-technical skills of teams (TEAM score 30.6 +/- 5.7 vs. 36.2 +/- 5.0, p = 0.015) (Table 1), mainly due to reducing performance in complex tasks such as planning of future actions, prioritisation, and following the guidelines. This was also reflected in participants self-assessment score (Table 1). Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in the quality parameters and timing of milestones during a simulated CPR. There were no differences in rescuers physiological responses. Conclusion(s): During a simulated crisis, extended PPE compared to the PPE recommended by the World Health Organisation degraded nontechnical team skills. This did not translate into measurable deterioration of patient-centred outcomes, such as quality or timing of CPR.

Effect of Early Treatment with Pegylated Interferon Lambda for Covid-19

Background: We assessed the efficacy of a single dose of peginterferon lambda in preventing clinical events among acutely symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients. Method(s): We conducted a placebo-controlled, randomized, adaptive platform trial among predominantly vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-positive adults in Brazil and Canada receiving either one subcutaneous injection of peginterferon lambda or placebo. The primary composite endpoint was medical admission to hospital, defined as either observation in a COVID-19 emergency setting for > 6 hours, or transfer to a tertiary hospital due to symptomatic COVID-19 within 28 days post-randomization. Result(s): For this evaluation, 931 patients received peginterferon lambda and 1018 received placebo. 84% of the population were vaccinated and the trial occurred across multiple COVID-19 variants. In the primary analysis of patients, the primary outcome was reduced by 51% in the peginterferon lambda vs. placebo groups (relative risk 0.49 [25/916 vs 57/1003], 95% Bayesian credible interval 0.30-0.76, posterior probability >99.9%). This effect was maintained in subgroup analyses including COVID-19-related hospitalization alone (relative risk 0.57, 95% Bayesian credible intervals 0.33-0.95, ) and COVID-19-related hospitalization or death (Hazard ratio 0.59, 95% Bayesian credible interval 0.35- 0.97). The effects were consistent across dominant variants and vaccination status. Among individuals with a high viral level at baseline, peginterferon lambda resulted in lower viral loads by Day 7, compared to placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. Conclusion(s): Among predominantly vaccinated outpatients with COVID-19, single-dose of peginterferon lambda resulted in significantly decreased clinical events.

Imperial Prostate-4 Comparative Healthcare Research Outcomes of Novel Surgery in Prostate Cancer (Ip4-Chronos): Early Feasibility, Safety and Functional Outcomes from a Pilot Rct

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Randomised comparative outcomes are unavailable for focal therapy in localised prostate cancer. IP4 CHRONOS is an RCT aimed to optimise recruitment of patients dependent upon clinician and patient equipoise. METHOD(S): Patients with clinically significant localised prostate cancer could opt for IP4-CHRONOS-A or IP4-CHRONOS-B. IP4- CHRONOS-A randomised patients 1:1 between focal therapy(HIFU or cryotherapy) versus radical therapy(radiation or prostatectomy). Using a multi-arm-multistage(MAMS)design, IP4-CHRONOS-B randomised between focal alone(FTA) and focal combined with neoadjuvant medication (12 weeks of finasteride [FTF] or bicalutamide [FTB]). We report the pilot phase outcomes on feasibility of randomisation, early safety outcomes relative to treatment and genito-urinary functional outcomes following over 12 months treatment in IP4-CHRONOS-B. IP4-CHRONOS had ethics committee approval and was registered(ISRCTN17796995). RESULT(S): Following COVID-19 adjustments, IP4-CHRONOSA did not meet its feasibility target. Having randomised 36 patients via10 sites with a recruitment rate (95% CI) of 18% (13-23) & randomisation rate of 97%(86-100). IP4-CHRONOS-B did meet its target, randomising 64 patients across 7 sites with a recruitment rate of 43% (35-52) &randomisation rate of 100%(94-100). The only patients to withdraw were randomised to the radical arm of IP4-CHRONOS-A(4 [22%]) All patients in IP4-CHRONOS-B were compliant with neoadjuvant treatment.Only 1 patient reported CTCAE V4.0 grade>=3 adverse event(AE) in IP4-CHRONOS-A following radical treatment, another patient in each arm reported a serious adverse event(SAE) following treatment. 1 &3 patients reported an AE &SAE following FTB. 2 and 3 patients reported an AE &SAE following FTA. No patients reported any AE or SAE event following FTF. Figure 1 demonstrates generally well preserved genito-urinary function following focal treatment+/-neoadjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION(S): IP4-CHRONOS evaluated patient and physician equipoise regarding focal therapy. Traditional randomisation was not feasible due to strong patient preferences, while a MAMS RCT investigating the role of neoadjuvant agents combined with focal therapy was.